As federal barriers persist, small banks quietly open doors to cannabis banking—signaling a fragile but real shift in U.S. financial policy.
In early 2025, a midsize dispensary in a regulated U.S. state quietly closed an unlikely deal: it opened a business checking account at a regional credit union that had long avoided cannabis clients. The bank, after months of compliance review, agreed under the condition that the dispensary adopt robust internal monitoring, transparent cash-handling practices, and regular audits.
That quiet deal speaks to a paradox at the heart of U.S. cannabis policy: here is a still-illegal (federally) industry gaining access to real banking services, one institution at a time.
Federal Prohibition and Historical Barriers
Federal prohibition, anchored in cannabis’s Schedule I status under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), has long barred financial institutions from treating cannabis proceeds as lawful. The risk of money-laundering liability, asset forfeiture, and regulatory penalties made banks effectively off-limits to cannabis businesses.
In 2014, FinCEN issued guidance to bridge that gap: “BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses.” This guidance directed that banks may serve cannabis clients if they adhered to robust due diligence and reporting rules, and must file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) in certain categories (Limited, Priority, Termination).
Because the underlying transactions remain federally illegal, the guidance insists that any bank serving cannabis clients still must file an SAR. That structural dissonance—state-legal but federally illicit—has been the central tension in cannabis finance.
Compounding the issue is Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code, which denies standard business expense deductions to entities trafficking in Schedule I or II substances. That tax burden (and the avoidance of audit risk) has made financial stability a heavier lift than in comparable industries.
In the early years, banks overwhelmingly declined cannabis relationships. Where acceptance existed, it was often with high fees, limited services, or under de facto cash-management models. The cost and risk premium were enormous.
The Emerging Banking Footprint
By Q4 2024, FinCEN reported 816 banks and credit unions engaged in cannabis-related business relationships. That figure is slightly down from a peak but is up significantly from earlier years. This breadth suggests the shift is no longer fringe—it’s a midsize sector of banking behavior.
Approximately 80% of SARs tied to cannabis are labeled “Marijuana Limited”—indicating financial institutions deemed the clients broadly compliant under state law. The remaining filings are split between “Termination” and “Priority.” A “Limited” SAR signals tacit tolerance by the bank, whereas “Priority” or “Termination” carry more aggressive compliance action or account closure.
Counties and states with more developed regulatory regimes tend to attract more banking participation. For instance, California leads in volume, followed by states with large dispensary footprints like Oklahoma. However, discrepancy remains: rural and less regulated jurisdictions see fewer banks willing to take on risk.
Some regional and community banks are entering cautiously. They demand high transparency: full cash-monitoring systems, 24/7 accounting visibility, and restrictive contractual terms. Larger national banks largely remain on the sidelines.
Quiet Normalization in Practice
Even though the rules haven’t changed, banks are operating more flexibly. They treat cannabis clients more like regulated utilities than criminal enterprises—if the compliance controls satisfy internal thresholds.
Successful institutions now operate with layered compliance: a front-line review unit, a cannabis-specific escalation channel, regular third-party audits, and formal risk committees. Banks differentiate between cultivation, retail, testing, ancillary services, and offer services accordingly.
Cannabis law firms, compliance consultancies, and fintechs (e.g., cash-monitoring platforms) are indispensable. They act as translators between cannabis business models and banking compliance frameworks. These third parties lower the barrier to entry by packaging compliance tools into services banks can adopt.
Political and Regulatory Lever Points
One of the most frequently speculated moves is shifting cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III. That change would not legalize cannabis outright, but would reclassify it with less regulatory severity. If that happened:
- The justification for 280E may weaken.
- Banks could argue cannabis proceeds are less criminal.
- Regulatory agencies might loosen constraints.
However, rescheduling doesn’t mean deregulation. Many risks remain.
The SAFER Banking Act proposes to shield regulated financial institutions from penalties simply for servicing state-legal cannabis businesses. While it has advanced in the Senate, it has not yet passed. Its passage would codify what many banks are already doing in practice.
FinCEN has not updated its 2014 guidance to reflect modern cannabis regimes. If new rules were issued, more banks might feel safer entering. Congress, under the SAFER Act, would require guidance updates within 180 days of enactment.
Banks are particularly sensitive to mixed signals. A rescinded memo, an enforcement sweep, or unclear DOJ messaging could scare banks away. Most shifts depend on predictability, not temporary permissiveness.
Scenarios and Forecasts
Regulatory Acceleration: Congress passes SAFER, executive support follows, FinCEN issues new guidance. Banks enter en masse. Cannabis businesses gain full financial access.
Gradual Evolution (Base Case): Progress continues slowly. New compliance tools emerge. Traditional banks remain cautious. Fintech fills gaps.
Regulatory Chaos: Mixed signals or conservative pushback scare banks. Operators lose access, revert to cash. Momentum stalls.
Wild Cards:
- DOJ crackdown
- Capital market shocks
- State-level backsliding
- Scientific breakthroughs in cannabis research
Risks, Tensions, and Counterarguments
Banks still face legal exposure. Reputational risks remain, especially in conservative communities. Large operators benefit disproportionately; smaller, equity, or rural players may be left out. And normalization could bring burdensome oversight.
Some analysts argue that normalization is overstated: most banks still offer limited services, no lending, no cards. Until capital markets open, this may remain a “banking lite” regime.
Implications for Stakeholders
Cannabis businesses gain security and growth opportunities with banking access. Banks find new revenue streams, but must weigh compliance burdens. Policymakers must balance access with control. Social equity demands proactive inclusion to prevent wealth concentration.
Pathways Forward
Policy must evolve:
- Pass SAFER Banking Act
- Update FinCEN guidance
- Promote transparency in SAR reporting
Banks and operators should adopt best practices, partner with compliance providers, and document rigorously. Monitoring tools must disaggregate data to highlight gaps and equity concerns.
We live in a paradox: cannabis remains federally illegal, yet financial institutions are increasingly engaging. The stakes are high. The quiet revolution in cannabis banking is real, but fragile. What happens next will determine whether this era becomes one of full financial integration or a temporary flirtation with risk tolerance. The clock is ticking.
***
Trap Culture is the ultimate destination for cannabis enthusiasts who want to experience the best of Arizona’s cannabis culture. Whether you are looking for the hottest cannabis-friendly events, the latest news on cannabis legalization, trends in the industry and exclusive, limited-edition products from the top brands in the market, Trap Culture has you covered. Visit our website to learn more about our events, our blog, and our store. Follow us on social media to stay updated on the latest news and promotions. Join the Trap Culture family and experience the most immersive and engaging social cannabis events in Arizona.
Follow us on social media
